I won't be able to comment if I don't see other responses. We have to chose the best answer.
Hy,
-> President A of the company had an average annual increase of profit by 11%. The former president had a positive rate of 7%. Obviously, Mr. A's marketing efforts caused the increase of 4%.
Which of the following, if true, would most weaken the above drawn conclusion?
OA: Just before the change of presidency, the former president bought another company doubling the revenue.
An increase of revenue does not similarly mean an increase in profit... that's a weak explanation, isn't it?
I won't be able to comment if I don't see other responses. We have to chose the best answer.
Problems Cannot be solved by the same level of thinking that created them"A.E
hi,
always provide answer choices to and OA if available to provide you with usefule analysis.
What are we supposed to do without the choices?
Bookmarks