-
January 9th, 2007 12:07 PM
#1
CR LSAT S 25 PARADOX
25. Police statistics have shown that automobile antitheft devices reduce the risk of car theft, but a statistical study of automobile theft by the automobile insurance industry claims that cars equipped with antitheft devices are, paradoxically, more likely to be stolen than cars that are not so equipped.
Which one of the following, if true, does the most to resolve the apparent paradox?
(A) Owners of stolen cars almost invariably report the theft immediately to the police but tend to delay notifying their insurance company, in the hope that the vehicle will be recovered.
(B) Most cars that are stolen are not equipped with antitheft devices, and most cars that are equipped with antitheft devices are not stolen.
(C) The most common automobile antitheft devices are audible alarms, which typically produce ten false alarms for every actual attempted theft.
(D) Automobile owners who have particularly theft-prone cars and live in areas of greatest incidence of car theft are those who are most likely to have antitheft devices installed.
(E) Most automobile thefts are the work of professional thieves against whose efforts antitheft devices offer scant protection.
Last edited by vcbabu; January 11th, 2007 at 09:32 PM.
-
-
January 11th, 2007 02:10 PM
#2
shah1237
Guest
D its is.
I wisshed u did not highlight the ans...
it would be better to test our skills
-
-
January 15th, 2007 07:31 AM
#3
maverick7777
Guest
Clearly D.
Simple probability concept. Cars with antithfet devices are more vulnerable because 1)owners have particularly theft-prone cars
2)and live in areas of greatest incidence of car theft
-
Tags for this Thread
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
Forum Rules
Bookmarks